• Home
  • About
  • Reading Lists
    • Egypt
    • Great Books
    • Iran
    • Islam
    • Israel
    • Liberalism
    • Napoleon
    • Nationalism
    • The Nuclear Age
    • Science
    • Russia
    • Turkey
  • Digital Footprint
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Pocket
    • SoundCloud
    • Twitter
    • Tumblr
    • YouTube
  • Contact
    • Email

Chaturanga

~ statecraft, strategy, society, and Σοφíα

Chaturanga

Tag Archives: Alvin Weinberg

A 50 Quadrillion Dollar Discovery

01 Wed Jun 2016

Posted by Jaideep A. Prabhu in Nuclear

≈ Comments Off on A 50 Quadrillion Dollar Discovery

Tags

Advanced Heavy Water Reactor, AEET, AHWR, Alvin Weinberg, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Versuchsreaktor, Atomic Energy Establishment Trombay, Britain, CHTR, CIRUS, Compact High Temperature Reactor, Dragon reactor, Flibe Energy, Glenn Seaborg, Homi Bhabha, IHTR, IMSBR, India, Indian Molten Salt Breeder Reactor, Innovative High Temperature Reactor, LFTR, Lingen, Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor, Molten Salt Reactor Experiment, MOX fuel, MSRE, Netherlands, nuclear, Purnima II, reprocessing, SUSPOP/KSTR, thorium, Transatomic Power, United States, uranium, WAMSR, Waste Annihilating Molten Salt Reactor

Sometimes, it is not easy to assess the importance of a discovery: JJ Thompson, the discoverer of the electron, is said to have once called his sub-atomic particle a most useless thing. Today, that same useless electron has gone on to drastically transform the world. Thorium shares an almost similar tale. Discovered in 1829 by Swedish chemist JJ Berzelius from samples of earth sent him by mineralogist Jens Esmark, the new element named after the Norse god of thunder, Thor, held only academic interest for the next half century.

In 1884, Auer von Welsbach invented the incandescent gas light mantle which used thorium oxide. However, when electricity replaced gas for lighting by the mid 1920s, thorium was again nearly forgotten. What saved the element was World War II and the quest for the atomic bomb.

It was the golden age of atomic science: in 1895, German physicist William Röntgen discovered x-rays, though their mechanism eluded him then. The following year, French physicist Henri Becquerel observed that uranium salts emitted rays similar to x-rays in their penetrating power but differing in that they seemed to arise internally in the uranium than be caused by any external excitation. Although credit for the 1898 discovery of radioactivity in thorium goes to the German chemist Gerhard Carl Schmidt, he believed that “thorium rays” were similar to “Röntgen rays”; an accurate understanding of the phenomenon had to await the work of Marie Curie and Ernest Rutherford.

Rutherford’s further experiments revealed basic atomic structure as well as a better understanding of radioactivity. Frederick Soddy, Rutherford’s colleague, saw the enormous potential of their discovery and wrote that here was a virtually inexhaustible source of energy that could, properly applied, “transform a desert continent, thaw the frozen poles, and make the whole earth one smiling Garden of Eden.”

The beginning of World War II put nuclear physics front and centre of the Allies’ agenda. Afraid that Germany might beat them to a horrendous new type of weapon – the German chemists, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, together with Austrian physicist Lise Meitner, had successfully created a small fission chain reaction in 1938, after all – the United States commenced the Manhattan Project, one of the most secretive, international, well-funded, and undemocratic technological initiative to date.

In this project, Glen Seaborg was tasked with assessing which would be the most suitable element to make a nuclear device. Due to wartime exigencies, no efforts were spared in rushing to an atomic bomb. Seaborg was allowed to experiment simultaneously on all tracks he thought worthy of yielding a working weapon – a very expensive proposition. As a result, research was conducted on uranium, plutonium, and thorium paths towards weaponisation. Thorium was found to be unsuitable for weaponisation and, again, the war came first: Seaborg spent most of the war years working with plutonium.

Seaborg’s work, however, had pointed to thorium’s eminent suitability as a fuel for peaceful purposes. Along with his research assistant John Gofman, Seaborg bombarded the thorium atom with neutrons from a cyclotron. They observed that thorium-232 transmuted to thorium-233 and then to protactinium-233. This was carefully extracted from the sample to avoid further transmutation to protactinium-234; after waiting for a couple of months, Gofman observed that the protactinium-233 had transmuted further, into uranium-233 as was later discovered. With the help of fellow researcher Raymond Stoughton, Gofman separated enough of the uranium-233 to test it for fissionability. As per his meticulous notes, it was on February 02, 1942, at 9:44 PM, that the uranium-233 first underwent fission via slow neutron absorption.

Seaborg had already noticed how abundant thorium was, far more than uranium, and when Gofman showed him the results of their labour, he is said to have exclaimed, “we have just made a $50,000,000,000,000,000 (fifty quadrillion) discovery!”

After the war, several of the scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project shifted their attention to peacetime applications of nuclear energy. Two of them, Alvin Weinberg and Forrest Murray, co-authored a paper on what would eventually evolve into the basic design for light water reactors. The authors were not remiss in noting the several drawbacks of their design, suggesting instead that a reactor operating on thorium would not face similar problems. In 1948, Weinberg became the director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and he kept the research on thorium reactors going. The Molten Salt Reactor Experiment was an experimental reactor that operated at ORNL from 1965 to 1969 and proved the viability of molten salt reactors.

Despite its success, the MSR programme was mothballed. The United States continued to work on the 50 quadrillion dollar discovery sporadically – such as with the experimental thorium-uranium-233 core inserted into a conventional pressurised water reactor at Shippingport in 1977 – but the results were not built upon. The reason for this, according to some such as Nobel laureate Carlo Rubbia, is that Washington was not interested in energy but in the production of plutonium to expand its nuclear arsenal and thorium reactors are particularly useless at supporting a nuclear weapons programme. It is only in the last decade that interest in thorium reactors in the United States has again risen but this time more among private entrepreneurs than the government.

Like the United States, most countries that were involved in thorium research gradually abandoned them. West Germany shut down the Lingen reactor in 1973, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Versuchsreaktor in 1988, and the Thorium High Temperature Reactor in 1989; Britain’s Dragon reactor was switched off in 1976, and the Netherlands pulled the plug on their SUSPOP/KSTR in 1977. India was one of the handful of exceptions that continued to try and tame thorium for energy purposes. Homi Bhabha, the father of the Indian nuclear programme, had theorised along the same lines as Weinberg by 1954 that given the abundance of thorium and the scarcity of uranium in his country, they would be better served by a fleet of thorium reactors rather than what was appearing to be the conventional choice of uranium fuelled reactors. Indian scientists were keen on collaborating with as many of the advanced Western countries as possible, from the United States to France, West Germany, Poland, Hungary, and others in basic nuclear science.

The Atomic Energy Establishment Trombay started working on producing thorium nitrates and oxides in 1955; Indian Rare Earths had been extracting thorium from the beaches of southern India already since 1950, primarily for export to the United States in exchange for help setting up the nuclear programme. By the mid-1960s, India had started irradiating thorium in the Canadian-supplied CIRUS reactor and in September 1970, uranium-233 was first recovered from the process. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, scientists at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre conducted experiments on the properties of thorium, uranium-233, mixed oxide fuels, reprocessing, fabrication, and other aspects of the thorium fuel cycle. Progress was slow for multiple reasons: the technical requirements of handling highly radioactive substances are stringent and remote manipulation in glove boxes was time-consuming and tedious; India’s nuclear tests in 1974 resulted in technological sanctions against the country which disrupted academic networks and supply chains; as a developing country, India could not afford the lavish sums thrown at nuclear programmes in the United States, France, and elsewhere; finally, a lack of political vision and bureaucratic politics stifled the pace of development.

Nonetheless, by 1984, India had built Purnima II, the first reactor in the world that handled uranium-233, part of the thorium fuel cycle. Experiments were also conducted using thorium-based mixed oxide fuel bundles in the regular fleet of heavy water reactors. In 1996, KAMINI went critical, the only presently operating uranium-233 fuelled reactor operating in the world. India has also been working on several thorium reactor designs, each at different stages of completion: the Compact High Temperature Reactor, the Innovative High Temperature Reactor, the Indian Molten Salt Breeder Reactor, and most famously, the Advanced Heavy Water Reactor. Construction on the AHWR is supposed to break ground this year but that is a tale that has been repeated for the past 12 years.

In recent years, several private companies have also started entering the thorium reactor business. Flibe Energy has been marketing the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor, while two doctoral students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technolgy started Transatomic Power on the strength of their Waste Annihilating Molten Salt Reactor.

Despite much optimism and promise, the development of thorium energy has historically been hampered by politics, bureaucracy, and economics. For a species whose hallmarks are greed and violence, it is sometimes puzzling that a 50 quadrillion dollar discovery is lying around, waiting to be tapped even 70 years after the realisation of its terraforming potential.


This post appeared on FirstPost on June 04, 2016.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Thorium Option

14 Mon May 2012

Posted by Jaideep A. Prabhu in Nuclear

≈ Comments Off on The Thorium Option

Tags

Alvin Weinberg, nuclear, thorium

When Glenn Seaborg’s team discovered in 1942 that thorium can be transmuted to uranium-233, they say that the future Nobel laureate exclaimed that they had made a 50 quadrillion dollar discovery – that is ‘5’ followed by 16 zeroes. Perhaps it was just euphoria, or maybe Seaborg thought of a world powered by thorium for a thousand years that made him utter what seems like such a hyperbole. Regardless, the scientist’s observation still stands – thorium provides an excellent option for the world to adopt a fuel that is reliable, abundant, safer, and environmentally friendlier than anything that is in use today.

For enthusiasts, progress is always slow, but all signs indicate that after decades of neglect, thorium technology is witnessing a revival. Several small private companies have started researching, designing, and promoting new reactors that are fuelled by thorium instead of uranium. Coming at just the right time with concerns of climate change reaching a peak and an ambivalence towards conventional nuclear energy in the West, thorium energy can well be the vehicle that creates tomorrow’s energy barons.

It is not that thorium has sprouted new enthusiasts overnight – the benefits were known decades ago. However, thorium reactor designs did not serve what was then seen as the primary purpose of providing for the military’s requirements of fissile material for their weapons programme. Alvin Weinberg, former director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, who, ironically, was one of the pioneers in light water reactor technology, was one of the early thorium enthusiasts as far back as the mid-1940s. Weinberg had criticised the light water path in a 1946 paper he had co-authored, suggesting the use of thorium to resolve several of the challenges the LWR design faced.

Thorium advocates even today emphasize some of these same strengths that Weinberg pointed out over half a century ago. One, for example, is that thorium reactors consume their fuel much more efficiently than uranium reactors. Conventional reactors burn through only about two or three percent of the fuel; a whopping 97 percent is jettisoned as nuclear waste. This waste contains not just uranium but also other long-lasting, highly radioactive, elements that makes disposal a complicated process. Furthermore, the volume of waste generated will be of concern if the world adopts nuclear power wholesale.

On the other hand, thorium reactors have been designed to burn their fuel more completely: some 98 percent of the fuel is used up and the resultant waste is a fraction of what conventional reactors generate. Such a high burnup reduces the cost of fuel as well as waste storage. Its most positive feature, however, is that few of the radioactive transuranic elements in conventional nuclear waste are present in thorium reactor waste; the thorium-uranium fuel cycle does not irradiate uranium-238 and consequently, plutonium, the key element proliferation experts fear, is also not present. Storage becomes significantly easier, safer, and trustable with thorium technology, a most useful feature when considering the possible deployment of hundreds of such reactors worldwide. In fact, thorium reactors can even be configured to burn existing nuclear waste and bypass the endless debates on geological depositories.

It is not just the waste that makes thorium technology attractive: the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor as well as the Advanced Heavy Water Reactor, the two primary thorium reactor designs in vogue presently, operate at low pressures. This reduces the chance of what is called a Loss of Coolant Accident or LOCA and lowers operational and construction costs. In fact, once a short, initial learning period is over and thorium reactors become mainstream, construction costs may become competitive with thermal power plants.

Although important, cost is not the primary lure of thorium technology. Thorium reactor designs come with several passive safety features that enhance safety. These innovations have made the reactors so safe that they can run for several days without any human input. The use of inherent properties of the fuel and other materials ensures that the reactor would shut down in case of an accident and the probability of a threat to human health is minuscule. For example, the Indian AHWR is considered so safe that Shiv Abhilash Bhardwaj, chairman of the Indian Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, has declared that the reactor could be built in the middle of a city without causing any concern. Not only would this reduce transmission costs but such characteristics could go a long way in allaying public fear about nuclear energy.

Another quality thorium reactors can boast of is their proliferation resistance. With the elimination of plutonium from its fuel cycle, thorium reactors are not particularly useful in clandestine nuclear weapons programmes. Over the past decade, several countries have expressed an interest in nuclear energy. Although dampened by the accident at Fukushima, Asia and Africa remain firm in their enthusiasm. The expansion of nuclear energy will put additional strain on an already extended IAEA. However, were thorium to become the face of the nuclear renaissance, it would ease the burden on the world’s proliferation watchdogs.

However, it is true that the uranium-233 into which thorium transmutes is a fissile material and may be used for weapons manufacture. Nonetheless, this is easier said than done: the uranium-233 in a thorium reactor contains an admixture of its isotope, uranium-232. The decay chain of this latter isotope is a potent source of gamma radiation and handling it requires remote manipulators. Furthermore, radioactivity increases and peaks around ten years for uranium-233 with even a five parts per million contamination of uranium-232. This is largely because of the presence of thallium-208 in the decay chain. Since the two uranium isotopes are chemically indistinguishable, it is very difficult to separate them for a weapons project.

Still, it is possible to remove the protactinium from the reactor so that it would decay to pure uranium-233. This would, however, require a dedicated national programme and make the theft or diversion of materials for a weapons programme easier to detect. Like the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Limited Test Ban Treaty, or the export controls of the Nuclear Suppliers Group which do not eliminate nuclear proliferation but make it more difficult, thorium reactors present several hurdles to a potential proliferation effort that makes weaponisation more difficult.

The best part about the promise of thorium is that it is already known to work. Research efforts in the United States between the 1960s and early 1980s have demonstrated that thorium reactors are feasible. Since then, related technology has only moved forward. India is ready to break ground on its AHWR design, proofing another design for the same principles.

The world stands on the cusp of a thorium renaissance. Not only has the thorium movement attracted excellent nuclear talent to itself but it has also evinced the interest of billionaire businessmen like Bill Gates, whose TerraPower has been investing in developing its own thorium molten salt reactor design. The environmental benefits of thorium reactors aside, there is an enormous economic windfall awaiting the first movers in this technology. The immediate next step, however, is for businesses to sit down with regulatory authorities to develop safety protocols for these new reactors.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Chirps

  • RT @fmbreon: Prof R. Read @GreenRupertRead, in yesterday debate with @ziontree, you claimed that the nuclear power plant EPR returns to a n… 1 day ago
  • Iran looms over Israel’s March 23 elections: bit.ly/3sMAVdz | Netanyahu would like that as it plays to his… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
  • What India must do to ensure it isn't caught off-guard by China again: bit.ly/3sRIKyD | Advice hasn't chan… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
  • China is losing influence - and we should get out of its way: bit.ly/3e9gEuD | Interesting argument, thoug… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
  • Disengagement in the Himalayas will not lead to friendship: bit.ly/386EKCs | Who could have possibly belie… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
Follow @orsoraggiante

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 213 other followers

Follow through RSS

  • RSS - Posts

Categories

Archives

Recent Posts

  • The Mysterious Case of India’s Jews
  • Polarised Electorates
  • The Election Season
  • Does Narendra Modi Have A Foreign Policy?
  • India and the Bomb
  • Nationalism Restored
  • Jews and Israel, Nation and State
  • The Asian in Europe
  • Modern Political Shibboleths
  • The Death of Civilisation
  • Hope on the Korean Peninsula
  • Diminishing the Heathens
  • The Writing on the Minority Wall
  • Mischief in Gaza
  • Politics of Spite
  • Thoughts on Nationalism
  • Never Again (As Long As It Is Convenient)
  • Earning the Dragon’s Respect
  • Creating an Indian Lake
  • Does India Have An Israel Policy?
  • Reclaiming David’s Kingdom
  • Not a Mahatma, Just Mohandas
  • How To Read
  • India’s Jerusalem Misstep
  • A Rebirth of American Power

Management

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com
Considerate la vostra semenza: fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza.

Blog at WordPress.com.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: